container audit
GTM-WVJ4WZ9
9 tags, 3 custom scripts, 3 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).
- 3 custom HTML tags carrying 1 KB of JavaScript. This runs on every page the container loads on.
- 3 third-party hosts reachable from its tags.
Tags9
Custom scripts3
Third parties3
Delivered423 KB
Versions48
What we observed
A real browser loaded k12dive.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.
Container loaded from
googletagmanager.com — GoogleMeasurement sent to
gametrics.k12dive.com — not GoogleMeasurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.
Forwarded to
GA4 ×3 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent
Quantcast answered its own API. Measurement fired beforehand but carried no identifier —
analytics_storage was denied, which is Consent Mode working as designed rather than a gap. no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied).Third parties contacted
11 hosts — cmp.osano.com, d12v9rtnomnebu.cloudfront.net, imgproxy.divecdn.com, ak.sail-horizon.com, fundingchoicesmessages.google.com, securepubads.g.doubleclick.net, pub.doubleverify.com, www.googletagmanager.com, and 3 more
dataLayer events seen
gtm.js, page.content, pressrelease_impression, gtm.dom, gtm.load
Where the data goes
Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to gametrics.k12dive.com, not to Google. observed on k12dive.com More info »
Findings
Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.
reviewHardcoded http:// URL (1)
1 piece of custom code reference a plain http:// address.
WhyOn an https:// page the browser blocks or upgrades these. Blocked means the tag quietly stops working; upgraded only works if that host also serves https.
CheckCheck whether the hosts below still respond over https, and update the URLs.
Seenseen in 12.8% of 46,522 containers measured
reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.
WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.
CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.
Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured
infoLoads JavaScript from another host (3)
3 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.
WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.
CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.
Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured
infoUses browser storage (1)
1 piece of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.
WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.
CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.
Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured
Third parties it can reach
Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »
What the custom templates can do
Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.
__cvt_32782448_103 private injects code from snap.licdn.com__cvt_32782448_104 private injects code from static.ads-twitter.com · runs page-level globals__cvt_32782448_105 private injects code from static.ads-twitter.com · runs page-level globalsDetected on
Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.
What this audit describes
Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.
| Container | GTM-WVJ4WZ9 |
|---|---|
| Published version | 48 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes. |
| Read at | 2026-08-23 18:22:15 UTC (a month ago) |
| Source | https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WVJ4WZ9 |
| Body checksum | b37bf81a793b4a4dd452ca43404ee6d26057e33e8ec9decc87343503177e80c7Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead. |
Re-audit
This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.
Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »