tagora
container audit

GTM-WT58

75 tags, 10 custom scripts, 7 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags75
Custom scripts10
Third parties7
Delivered579 KB
Versions295

What we observed

A real browser loaded ifirma.pl 2 months ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from not observed loading
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google

Where the data goes

Nothing fired — we loaded the page and no tag library or measurement request ran, which usually means a consent banner held everything back. The container below still describes what would run once it does. observed on ifirma.pl More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewUniversal Analytics tags still shipped (3)
3 Universal Analytics tags are still in the container.

WhyUniversal Analytics stopped processing data in July 2023. These tags still download and execute on every matching page, and send to an endpoint that discards them.

CheckNothing is being collected from these. Confirm the equivalent GA4 tag exists, then delete them.

Seenseen in 23.2% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewSame Google Ads conversion defined more than once (1)
1 conversion action is defined by more than one tag.

WhyA conversion ID plus label identifies one action. Two tags carrying the same pair can report the same conversion twice, inflating conversion counts and the ROAS that bidding runs on.

CheckCheck whether both tags can fire on the same page. If they can, your Ads reporting is overstating this action and automated bidding is optimising against it.

Seenseen in 3.8% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (3)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (2)
2 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoVendor IDs written into custom code (1)
1 vendor ID is pasted directly into custom HTML rather than held in a variable or template.

WhyChanging a property, pixel or account then means editing every tag that mentions it, and any one that gets missed keeps sending to the old destination indefinitely.

CheckFine if the ID never changes. If you have ever migrated a property, check that none of these still point at the old one.

Seenseen in 31.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.google-analytics.com ×29www.googleadservices.com ×12analytics.tiktok.com ×1connect.facebook.net ×1ga.getresponse.com ×1www.clarity.ms ×1www.facebook.com ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_95912_331 private injects code from x.cookiebot.com, x.cookiebot.eu
__cvt_95912_317 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_95912_319 private injects code from snap.licdn.com

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

ifirma.pl

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-WT58
Published version295 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-12 22:59:53 UTC (2 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WT58
Body checksum6159b2a6c40540aafbe6e9f82813b19764ab195b92c7bdd5a70fa14020bc5c89
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 2 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-WT58

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »