tagora
container audit

GTM-WN7TG7J

22 tags, 4 custom scripts, 7 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags22
Custom scripts4
Third parties7
Delivered462 KB
Versions17

What we observed

A real browser loaded babycenter.si a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from load.sst.babycenter.si — the site's own host, at /fdsajkhth/gtag/js rather than the default path
Measurement sent to www.babycenter.si — not Google, at /fdsajkhth/g/collect

Both wires run through infrastructure the site controls.

Forwarded to GA4 ×8 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent a consent platform is present, but our browser could not complete the accept step — so the before-and-after comparison did not run here. 4 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 15 hosts — cdnjs.cloudflare.com, cdn-cookieyes.com, cdn.jsdelivr.net, log.cookieyes.com, static.klaviyo.com, www.google.com, maps.googleapis.com, www.gstatic.com, and 7 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, view_item_list, gtm.dom, gtm.load, configLoaded

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to www.babycenter.si, not to Google. observed on babycenter.si More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (4)
4 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

analytics.tiktok.com ×1cdn. ×1cdn.flockr.co ×1googleads.g.doubleclick.net ×1www.clarity.ms ×1www.google-analytics.com ×1www.googleadservices.com ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_118566335_7 private injects code from tags.creativecdn.com · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

babycenter.si

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-WN7TG7J
Published version17 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-13 17:47:24 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WN7TG7J
Body checksumbcdcaaa7fbc1010f976eebf9e924c4bd1292b6fb6ba1414e874b497564a298da
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-WN7TG7J

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »