container audit
GTM-WK44ZFM
7 tags, 4 custom scripts, 1 third-party host — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).
- 4 custom HTML tags carrying 1 KB of JavaScript. This runs on every page the container loads on.
- 1 third-party host reachable from its tags.
- Measurement runs through a server container on its own domain — the mark of a mature setup, and rarer than the tooling vendors imply.
Tags7
Custom scripts4
Third parties1
Delivered378 KB
Versions31
What we observed
A real browser loaded conan.io a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.
Container loaded from
gtm.jfrog.com — the site's own host, and googletagmanager.comMeasurement sent to
gtm.conan.io — not GoogleMeasurement runs through the site's own infrastructure. Part of the tag library still comes from Google, which is normal — the two are loaded separately.
Forwarded to
GA4 ×2 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent
a consent platform is present, but our browser could not complete the accept step — so the before-and-after comparison did not run here. Google recorded
gcs=G100 (all denied).Third parties contacted
5 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, transcend-cdn.com, gtm.jfrog.com, leap.jfrog.com, www.googletagmanager.com
dataLayer events seen
gtm.js, fireEvent, clearData, gtm.dom, gtm.load
Where the data goes
Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to gtm.conan.io, not to Google. observed on conan.io More info »
Findings
Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.
infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.
WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.
CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.
Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured
Third parties it can reach
Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »
Detected on
Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.
What this audit describes
Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.
| Container | GTM-WK44ZFM |
|---|---|
| Published version | 31 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes. |
| Read at | 2026-08-23 18:19:23 UTC (a month ago) |
| Source | https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WK44ZFM |
| Body checksum | 9927ff0c6030b4c1bb0b26114e092754094308bb01740a901d9d4f4a8ed2f7c3Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead. |
Re-audit
This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.
Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »