tagora
container audit

GTM-WDGGRR

This container can hand execution to 13 third parties — more than 90% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. Each serves code it controls, which can change at any time.

Tags58
Custom scripts33
Third parties13
Delivered561 KB
Versions858

What we observed

A real browser loaded lojavirtualtim.com.br a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to gtm.timbrasil.com.br — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×12 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent no consent gate responded on this page, so there was nothing to hold measurement back (banners are often shown only to visitors in certain regions, and this was not a European visit). 10 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — cdn-prod.securiti.ai, cdn.decibelinsight.net, resources.digital-cloud-west.medallia.com, dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com, collection.decibelinsight.net, app.securiti.ai, analytics-fe.digital-cloud-west.medallia.com, www.googletagmanager.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, lista-de-vitrine, gtm.triggerGroup, lista-de-ofertas, gtm.click, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to gtm.timbrasil.com.br, not to Google. observed on lojavirtualtim.com.br More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewHardcoded http:// URL (1)
1 piece of custom code reference a plain http:// address.

WhyOn an https:// page the browser blocks or upgrades these. Blocked means the tag quietly stops working; upgraded only works if that host also serves https.

CheckCheck whether the hosts below still respond over https, and update the URLs.

Seenseen in 12.8% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewWrites cookies directly (1)
1 piece of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoOne variable that a great deal depends on (87)
"gtm.triggers" is read by 87 tags and triggers — more than anything else in this container.

WhyGTM shows you where a variable is defined, never how much depends on it. Editing this one touches a large share of the container at once, and whatever breaks will surface somewhere that looks unrelated to the change.

CheckBefore changing it, check what reads it. If it feeds both measurement and consent or routing logic, split those uses apart first.

Seenseen in 10.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (5)
5 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoVendor IDs written into custom code (2)
2 vendor IDs are pasted directly into custom HTML rather than held in a variable or template.

WhyChanging a property, pixel or account then means editing every tag that mentions it, and any one that gets missed keeps sending to the old destination indefinitely.

CheckFine if the ID never changes. If you have ever migrated a property, check that none of these still point at the old one.

Seenseen in 31.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

secure.adnxs.com ×17fls.doubleclick.net ×13analytics.tiktok.com ×3connect.facebook.net ×3s.amazon-adsystem.com ×2www. ×2www.facebook.com ×2www.google-analytics.com ×2c.amazon-adsystem.com ×1http2.mlstatic.com ×1p.teads.tv ×1sp.analytics.yahoo.com ×1www.tim.com.br ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_5RM3Q gallery injects code from connect.facebook.net, capi-automation.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com · runs page-level globals
__cvt_MRQN8 gallery runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

lojavirtualtim.com.brtim.com.br

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-WDGGRR
Published version858 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-22 13:40:05 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WDGGRR
Body checksumeb6d00e032d11d8b53be9daa14452eb77002148d4811d9ab8b4980387929f06d
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-WDGGRR

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »