tagora
container audit

GTM-WBWFRQC

12 tags, 5 custom scripts, 9 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags12
Custom scripts5
Third parties9
Delivered447 KB
Versions16

What we observed

A real browser loaded hainanairlines.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent no consent gate responded on this page, so there was nothing to hold measurement back (banners are often shown only to visitors in certain regions, and this was not a European visit).
Third parties contacted 11 hosts — cdn.dingxiang-inc.com, www.googletagmanager.com, www.google-analytics.com, static.connect.travelaudience.com, www.google.com, ad.doubleclick.net, www.google.co.il, analytics.google.com, and 3 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load, autofeed_trigger

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on hainanairlines.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewHardcoded http:// URL (3)
3 pieces of custom code reference a plain http:// address.

WhyOn an https:// page the browser blocks or upgrades these. Blocked means the tag quietly stops working; upgraded only works if that host also serves https.

CheckCheck whether the hosts below still respond over https, and update the URLs.

Seenseen in 12.8% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.hainanairlines.com ×19www.googleadservices.com ×5www.truemetrics.cn ×2googleads.g.doubleclick.net ×1static.connect.travelaudience.com ×1storage.googleapis.com ×1www.google-analytics.com ×1www.picture.com ×1www.securitytrfx.com ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

hainanairlines.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-WBWFRQC
Published version16 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 18:17:37 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-WBWFRQC
Body checksum1e1fec41b5a4e7bf84a5a09dfbdab754f18c7a6e7b8dd9b1dcc5f3aca7353127
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-WBWFRQC

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »