tagora
container audit

GTM-V9WM

23 tags, 1 custom scripts, 4 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags23
Custom scripts1
Third parties4
Delivered492 KB
Versions109

What we observed

A real browser loaded 2brightsparks.com 2 months ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent Cookiebot answered its own API. 2 measurement hits left the page before it was granted, carrying a client id (whether that is permitted depends on jurisdiction, and this was not a European visit). no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied). 4 advertising hosts were contacted before anything was granted.
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — static.cloudflareinsights.com, sbl.onfastspring.com, widget.trustpilot.com, widget.freshworks.com, reviewsonmywebsite.com, smartarget.online, www.googletagmanager.com, utt.impactcdn.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load, cookie_consent_preferences, cookie_consent_statistics, cookie_consent_marketing

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on 2brightsparks.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewdocument.write (1)
1 piece of custom code call document.write.

Whydocument.write blocks the HTML parser while it runs, and browsers ignore it entirely once the page has finished parsing — so an async-loaded tag using it can silently do nothing.

CheckIf these tags fire on page load they are costing render time; if they fire later they may not be working at all. Worth confirming the tag still does what it was added to do.

Seenseen in 18.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (3)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.googleadservices.com ×11www.google-analytics.com ×42brightsparks.onfastspring.com ×2googleads.g.doubleclick.net ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_155631_94 private injects code from x.cookiebot.com, x.cookiebot.eu
__cvt_K8GSG gallery runs page-level globals
__cvt_K8HMJ gallery runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

2brightsparks.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-V9WM
Published version109 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-13 17:08:43 UTC (3 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-V9WM
Body checksumdb2f779dfb959ad23a4f820aefe91a2c29cc919c4ed245b1a105901e65a95345
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 3 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-V9WM

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »