tagora
container audit

GTM-TPWNL6H

This container can hand execution to 13 third parties — more than 90% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. Each serves code it controls, which can change at any time.

Tags58
Custom scripts33
Third parties13
Delivered581 KB
Versions1003

What we observed

A real browser loaded tchibo.pl a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to www.tchibo.pl, sst.tchibo.pl — not Google, at /tpwnl6h/ag/g/c

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×4 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent Usercentrics answered its own API. Nothing measured until it was granted — no analytics or advertising hit left the page beforehand, and 4 fired afterwards. That is the outcome consent is meant to produce. 10 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — web.cmp.usercentrics.eu, v1.api.service.cmp.usercentrics.eu, app.usercentrics.eu, www.googletagmanager.com, uct.service.usercentrics.eu, consent-api.service.consent.usercentrics.eu, track.adform.net, connect.facebook.net, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, pageview, pageview_ga4, ga_event, gtm.dom, gtm.load, consent_status

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to www.tchibo.pl, sst.tchibo.pl, not to Google. observed on tchibo.pl More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites cookies directly (6)
6 pieces of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewSame GA4 property configured more than once (1)
G-VZNMYKP30X is configured by 2 separate tags.

WhyEach config tag initialises the property independently, so a single page view can be counted once per tag. Sessions, users and conversion rates all inherit the error.

CheckIf more than one of these fires on the same page you are double-counting. Compare against a known-good day, or check for a step change in traffic when the second tag was added.

Seenseen in 4.8% of 46,522 containers measured

infoUses browser storage (8)
8 pieces of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.

WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.

CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.

Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (2)
2 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

sst.eduscho.at ×2sst.tchibo. ×2ctagm.tchibo.de ×1rum.browser-intake-datadoghq.eu ×1sst.tchibo.de ×1t.contentsquare.net ×1unpkg.com ×1www.eduscho.at ×1www.fr.tchibo.ch ×1www.tchibo.at ×1www.tchibo.ch ×1www.tchibo.de ×1www.tchibo.pl ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

tchibo.sktchibo.hutchibo.com.trtchibo.cztchibo.attchibo.pltchibo.de

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-TPWNL6H
Published version1003 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-22 14:09:33 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TPWNL6H
Body checksumf9289dad8dd3bc4e396cd364090bf049cead2b26926f0a9d90993e25eea1e057
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-TPWNL6H

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »