tagora
container audit

GTM-THX39ZXN

14 tags, 5 custom scripts, 3 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags14
Custom scripts5
Third parties3
Delivered437 KB
Versions15

What we observed

A real browser loaded famylocate.app a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to famylocate.app — not Google, at /gtg-famylocate/ag/g/c

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×2 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent no consent gate responded on this page, so there was nothing to hold measurement back (banners are often shown only to visitors in certain regions, and this was not a European visit).
Third parties contacted 19 hosts — unpkg.com, ebanx-js.ebanx.com, connect.facebook.net, sc-static.net, cdn.growthbook.io, static.hotjar.com, analytics.gismart.xyz, cdnjs.cloudflare.com, and 11 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to famylocate.app, not to Google. observed on famylocate.app More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewdocument.write (4)
4 pieces of custom code call document.write.

Whydocument.write blocks the HTML parser while it runs, and browsers ignore it entirely once the page has finished parsing — so an async-loaded tag using it can silently do nothing.

CheckIf these tags fire on page load they are costing render time; if they fire later they may not be working at all. Worth confirming the tag still does what it was added to do.

Seenseen in 18.4% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (5)
5 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

static.newsbreak.com ×5www.google-analytics.com ×5www.googleadservices.com ×4

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

famylocate.app

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-THX39ZXN
Published version15 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 18:10:38 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-THX39ZXN
Body checksum2e89e7c71503f782a9caa700708b07122de2d46ab15d47edcccf7544c7097fd5
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-THX39ZXN

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »