tagora
container audit

GTM-TB4BNH

24 tags, 8 custom scripts, 2 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags24
Custom scripts8
Third parties2
Delivered529 KB
Versions482

What we observed

A real browser loaded maistra.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to t.maistra.com — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×3 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent a consent banner was present and we accepted it. Measurement fired beforehand but carried no identifier — analytics_storage was denied, which is Consent Mode working as designed rather than a gap. 3 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied).
Third parties contacted 14 hosts — js.sentry-cdn.com, res.cloudinary.com, cdn.jsdelivr.net, delivery.consent.hr, cdn.consent.hr, browser.sentry-cdn.com, maistra-proxy-huhdcvdve6e6brag.z01.azurefd.net, www.googletagmanager.com, and 6 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, default_consent, cmpEventLoadedLayerOpen, cmpEventLoadFinished, cmpEvent, gtm.load, gtm.click

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to t.maistra.com, not to Google. observed on maistra.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (2)
2 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

cdn. ×1squeezely.tech ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_803372_1203 private injects code from web-sdk.smartlook.com · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

maistra.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-TB4BNH
Published version482 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-13 16:03:38 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TB4BNH
Body checksumac48bbabdbf7736d23b15644952bd4d967739180906172548332a0742713b3a0
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-TB4BNH

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »