tagora
container audit

GTM-PT36BS6H

28 tags, 0 custom scripts, 0 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags28
Custom scripts0
Third parties0
Delivered460 KB
Versions533

What we observed

A real browser loaded underarmour.co.jp a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to capi.underarmour.co.jp — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×6 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent no consent gate responded on this page, so there was nothing to hold measurement back (banners are often shown only to visitors in certain regions, and this was not a European visit). 1 host appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, cdnjs.cloudflare.com, r2.snva.jp, static.staff-start.com, static-fe.payments-amazon.com, under-armour.app.baqend.com, www.googleoptimize.com, www.googletagmanager.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to capi.underarmour.co.jp, not to Google. observed on underarmour.co.jp More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites innerHTML (1)
1 piece of custom code assign to innerHTML.

WhyAssigning innerHTML parses the string as HTML. If any of it comes from the URL, the page or a cookie, that is a script-injection route into your own site.

CheckCheck whether the assigned value is a fixed template or built from something a visitor can influence.

Seenseen in 5.7% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoUses browser storage (1)
1 piece of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.

WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.

CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.

Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

No third-party hosts were found in this container's tags.

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

underarmour.co.jp

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-PT36BS6H
Published version533 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 18:05:12 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PT36BS6H
Body checksum26c79b28d3acbe534ee970e0c8c491364360bf2f9c52a2aafaa344f6864d5340
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-PT36BS6H

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »