tagora
container audit

GTM-PLM7RXW8

6 tags, 1 custom scripts, 1 third-party host — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags6
Custom scripts1
Third parties1
Delivered384 KB
Versions10

What we observed

A real browser loaded aeg.de a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from www.aeg.de — the site's own host, at /gtg/gtm.js rather than the default path, and googletagmanager.com
Measurement sent to www.aeg.de — not Google, at /analytics/g/collect

Measurement runs through the site's own infrastructure. Part of the tag library still comes from Google, which is normal — the two are loaded separately.

Forwarded to GA4 ×8 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent OneTrust answered its own API. Nothing measured until it was granted — no analytics or advertising hit left the page beforehand, and 8 fired afterwards. That is the outcome consent is meant to produce. 10 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — s.go-mpulse.net, cdn.cookielaw.org, www.datadoghq-browser-agent.com, c.go-mpulse.net, browser-intake-datadoghq.com, www.google.com, www.googletagmanager.com, 684d0d41.akstat.io, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, OneTrustLoaded, OptanonLoaded, gtm.dom, gtm.load, gtm.elementVisibility, gtm.click, trackOptanonEvent, OneTrust_marketing_trigger, BlueConic, gtm.historyChange

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to www.aeg.de, not to Google. observed on aeg.de More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.google-analytics.com ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

aeg.de

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-PLM7RXW8
Published version10 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 18:03:15 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PLM7RXW8
Body checksum6070f54abff7f75531dc476881873243fdf0c122d71094874d7f4a22c93fd580
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-PLM7RXW8

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »