tagora
container audit

GTM-PCHPZQBZ

This container ships 251 hand-written scripts (107 KB of JavaScript) to every visitor — more than 99% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. That is an application's worth of code, delivered as tag configuration.

Tags385
Custom scripts251
Third parties24
Delivered775 KB
Versions9

What we observed

A real browser loaded suumo.jp a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent 7 hosts appeared only after consent was granted.
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com, recruit.112.2o7.net, www.googletagmanager.com, s.yimg.jp, static.ads-twitter.com, tm.r-ad.ne.jp, js.adsrvr.org, analytics.tiktok.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load, brdm_fire, brdm_firec

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on suumo.jp More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites cookies directly (24)
24 pieces of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewdocument.write (6)
6 pieces of custom code call document.write.

Whydocument.write blocks the HTML parser while it runs, and browsers ignore it entirely once the page has finished parsing — so an async-loaded tag using it can silently do nothing.

CheckIf these tags fire on page load they are costing render time; if they fire later they may not be working at all. Worth confirming the tag still does what it was added to do.

Seenseen in 18.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (33)
33 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoUses browser storage (8)
8 pieces of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.

WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.

CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.

Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured

infoVendor IDs written into custom code (5)
5 vendor IDs are pasted directly into custom HTML rather than held in a variable or template.

WhyChanging a property, pixel or account then means editing every tag that mentions it, and any one that gets missed keeps sending to the old destination indefinitely.

CheckFine if the ID never changes. If you have ever migrated a property, check that none of these still point at the old one.

Seenseen in 31.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.googleadservices.com ×54googleads.g.doubleclick.net ×43connect.facebook.net ×17fls.doubleclick.net ×10insight.adsrvr.org ×8static.criteo.net ×8mk.ca-conv.jp ×6px.ladsp.com ×6s.yimg.jp ×4static.ads-twitter.com ×3analytics.tiktok.com ×2asr.ladsp.com ×2cdn-edge.karte.io ×2js.adsrvr.org ×2js.fout.jp ×2medipa.jp ×2s.pinimg.com ×2secure2.adcent.jp ×2sp-trk.com ×2static.karte.io ×2asia.creativecdn.com ×1i.smartnews-ads.com ×1itrack2.valuecommerce.ne.jp ×1pixel.byspotify.com ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_179199851_1147 private injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_179199851_1148 private injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_179199851_1152 private injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_179199851_1155 private injects code from s.yimg.jp
__cvt_179199851_1157 private injects code from s.yimg.jp
__cvt_179199851_1160 private injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_179199851_1163 private injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_179199851_1171 private injects code from s.yimg.jp

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

suumo.jp

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-PCHPZQBZ
Published version9 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-22 10:34:46 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-PCHPZQBZ
Body checksumecf1cbce3742698c9f50d8d919f9f5d655da94863b712f0c90ba690e478814e0
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-PCHPZQBZ

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »