tagora
container audit

GTM-NPF5BHM8

73 tags, 5 custom scripts, 4 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags73
Custom scripts5
Third parties4
Delivered499 KB
Versions664

What we observed

A real browser loaded secorsubaru.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent a consent banner was present and we accepted it. 9 measurement hits left the page before it was granted, carrying a client id (whether that is permitted depends on jurisdiction, and this was not a European visit). 3 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G101 (partial). 4 advertising hosts were contacted before anything was granted.
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — pictures.dealer.com, cdn.complyauto.com, images.dealer.com, cdn.userway.org, platform.twitter.com, review-carousel-resource.kenect.com, ftm.fluencyinc.co, cdn2.webdamdb.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, ddc.launchdarkly, ddc.launchdarkly.browser, ddc.page.view, ddc.maps, gtm.dom, gtm.load, gtm.click, ddc.link.generic

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on secorsubaru.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites cookies directly (1)
1 piece of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (4)
4 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.google-analytics.com ×67d1ov1z9oat6h4t.cloudfront.net ×1dheu6jgpd6.execute-api.us-east-1.amazonaws.com ×1dkbcpcob6xxyt.cloudfront.net ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

secorsubaru.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-NPF5BHM8
Published version664 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 17:56:17 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NPF5BHM8
Body checksum95f78a1143c005ac5683ae4b92e4c3e4843d7fcec7ba409b69ff7f1d1cd3bc91
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-NPF5BHM8

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »