tagora
container audit

GTM-NK2VKTQ

This container ships 44 hand-written scripts (40 KB of JavaScript) to every visitor — more than 90% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. That is an application's worth of code, delivered as tag configuration.

Tags177
Custom scripts44
Third parties8
Delivered683 KB
Versions864

What we observed

A real browser loaded basworld.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to sst.basworld.com — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×6 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent a consent banner was present and we accepted it. Measurement fired beforehand but carried no identifier — analytics_storage was denied, which is Consent Mode working as designed rather than a gap. 7 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — cdn.ablyft.com, o462607.ingest.us.sentry.io, www.googletagmanager.com, cdn.cookie-script.com, tags.creativecdn.com, dynamic.criteo.com, cdn.leadinfo.net, www.cloudflare.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, consent_default, gtm.dom, gtm.load, CookieScriptGoogleConsentUpdated, CookieScriptConsentUpdated[targeting,performance,unclassified,functionality,strict], CookieScriptCategory-targeting, CookieScriptCategory-performance, CookieScriptCategory-unclassified, CookieScriptCategory-functionality, CookieScriptCategory-strict

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to sst.basworld.com, not to Google. observed on basworld.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites cookies directly (3)
3 pieces of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewHardcoded http:// URL (1)
1 piece of custom code reference a plain http:// address.

WhyOn an https:// page the browser blocks or upgrades these. Blocked means the tag quietly stops working; upgraded only works if that host also serves https.

CheckCheck whether the hosts below still respond over https, and update the URLs.

Seenseen in 12.8% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewWrites innerHTML (1)
1 piece of custom code assign to innerHTML.

WhyAssigning innerHTML parses the string as HTML. If any of it comes from the URL, the page or a cookie, that is a script-injection route into your own site.

CheckCheck whether the assigned value is a fixed template or built from something a visitor can influence.

Seenseen in 5.7% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (4)
4 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (3)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

script.adcalls.nl ×2www.cloudflare.com ×2analytics.tiktok.com ×1cdn.leadinfo.net ×1static.widget.trengo.eu ×1trustpilot.com ×1www.clarity.ms ×1www.w3.org ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_31970345_1055 private injects code from dynamic.criteo.com
__cvt_31970345_1137 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_31970345_363 private injects code from connect.facebook.net · runs page-level globals
__cvt_31970345_860 private injects code from snap.licdn.com
__cvt_31970345_951 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_579DB gallery runs page-level globals
__cvt_K4VST gallery injects code from tags.creativecdn.com · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

basworld.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-NK2VKTQ
Published version864 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 17:55:07 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NK2VKTQ
Body checksum99fbc7c72d9d920d5c772db88de3dea75f0d110aaa5db35ff7a7f0835f055515
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-NK2VKTQ

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »