container audit
GTM-NGGGPVP
This container ships 72 hand-written scripts (20 KB of JavaScript) to every visitor — more than 96% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. That is an application's worth of code, delivered as tag configuration.
- 10 third-party hosts reachable from its tags — more than 80% of the 46,522 containers we have measured.
- Measurement runs through a server container on its own domain — the mark of a mature setup, and rarer than the tooling vendors imply.
duplicate-ads-conversionis uncommon — under 4% of the containers we have measured have it. That is context rather than a verdict: a server container is rarer still and is a sign of a mature setup. What it means is in the finding itself.
Tags309
Custom scripts72
Third parties10
Delivered662 KB
Versions285
What we observed
A real browser loaded corepoweryoga.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.
Container loaded from
googletagmanager.com — GoogleMeasurement sent to
google-analytics.com — GoogleConsent
a consent banner was present and responded. 7 hosts appeared only after consent was granted.
Third parties contacted
25 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, images.ctfassets.net, cdn.contentful.com, www.googletagmanager.com, cmp.osano.com, c.amazon-adsystem.com, connect.facebook.net, w.appzi.io, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen
gtm.js, roktInitComplete, gtm.dom, gtm.load, gtm.click
Where the data goes
Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on corepoweryoga.com More info »
Findings
Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.
reviewSame Google Ads conversion defined more than once (1)
1 conversion action is defined by more than one tag.
WhyA conversion ID plus label identifies one action. Two tags carrying the same pair can report the same conversion twice, inflating conversion counts and the ROAS that bidding runs on.
CheckCheck whether both tags can fire on the same page. If they can, your Ads reporting is overstating this action and automated bidding is optimising against it.
Seenseen in 3.8% of 46,522 containers measured
reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.
WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.
CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.
Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured
infoOne variable that a great deal depends on (79)
"gtm.element" is read by 79 tags and triggers — more than anything else in this container.
WhyGTM shows you where a variable is defined, never how much depends on it. Editing this one touches a large share of the container at once, and whatever breaks will surface somewhere that looks unrelated to the change.
CheckBefore changing it, check what reads it. If it feeds both measurement and consent or routing logic, split those uses apart first.
Seenseen in 10.1% of 46,522 containers measured
infoLoads JavaScript from another host (4)
4 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.
WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.
CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.
Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured
infoVendor IDs written into custom code (2)
2 vendor IDs are pasted directly into custom HTML rather than held in a variable or template.
WhyChanging a property, pixel or account then means editing every tag that mentions it, and any one that gets missed keeps sending to the old destination indefinitely.
CheckFine if the ID never changes. If you have ever migrated a property, check that none of these still point at the old one.
Seenseen in 31.4% of 46,522 containers measured
infoUses browser storage (1)
1 piece of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.
WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.
CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.
Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured
Third parties it can reach
Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »
cdn.tapad.app ×5tag.tapad.com ×5connect.facebook.net ×3www.facebook.com ×3analytics.tiktok.com ×2apps.rokt-api.com ×2arttrk.com ×2static.hotjar.com ×1static.klaviyo.com ×1w.appzi.io ×1
What the custom templates can do
Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.
__cvt_31176664_854 private injects code from c.amazon-adsystem.com · runs page-level globals__cvt_MRQN8 gallery runs page-level globalsDetected on
Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.
What this audit describes
Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.
| Container | GTM-NGGGPVP |
|---|---|
| Published version | 285 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes. |
| Read at | 2026-08-23 17:54:14 UTC (a month ago) |
| Source | https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NGGGPVP |
| Body checksum | 6a4a83bff99e074071797dce8468d2a5b2f4d92670de7b875a80108db20e2443Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead. |
Re-audit
This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.
Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »