tagora
container audit

GTM-NCWXWBN2

This container ships 41 hand-written scripts (140 KB of JavaScript) to every visitor — more than 90% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. That is an application's worth of code, delivered as tag configuration.

Tags41
Custom scripts41
Third parties6
Delivered484 KB
Versions15

What we observed

A real browser loaded heineken.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from www.heineken.com — the site's own host, at /hei-sst/gtm.js rather than the default path, and googletagmanager.com
Measurement sent to www.heineken.com — not Google, at /hei-sst/g/collect

Measurement runs through the site's own infrastructure. Part of the tag library still comes from Google, which is normal — the two are loaded separately.

Forwarded to GA4 ×6 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent OneTrust answered its own API. Measurement fired beforehand but carried no identifier — analytics_storage was denied, which is Consent Mode working as designed rather than a gap. no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied).
Third parties contacted 17 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, cdn.cookielaw.org, js.monitor.azure.com, www.googletagmanager.com, geolocation.onetrust.com, pagead2.googlesyndication.com, www.google-analytics.com, westeurope-5.in.applicationinsights.azure.com, and 9 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, OneTrustLoaded, OptanonLoaded, gtm.dom, gtm.load, page_view, gtm.click

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to www.heineken.com, not to Google. observed on heineken.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites innerHTML (40)
40 pieces of custom code assign to innerHTML.

WhyAssigning innerHTML parses the string as HTML. If any of it comes from the URL, the page or a cookie, that is a script-injection route into your own site.

CheckCheck whether the assigned value is a fixed template or built from something a visitor can influence.

Seenseen in 5.7% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoUses browser storage (39)
39 pieces of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.

WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.

CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.

Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.moderationmatters.com ×39issuu.com ×1www.iard.org ×1www.nhs.uk ×1www.niaaa.nih.gov ×1www.who.int ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

heineken.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-NCWXWBN2
Published version15 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-12 22:36:59 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NCWXWBN2
Body checksum8cb9ca79ee804b89802a9eb7285e86075078485d3c37ffcbca8e76ea6e805485
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-NCWXWBN2

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »