container audit
GTM-NBFDXR9
28 tags, 0 custom scripts, 2 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).
- 2 third-party hosts reachable from its tags.
Tags28
Custom scripts0
Third parties2
Delivered514 KB
Versions89
What we observed
A real browser loaded mediamarkt.com.tr a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.
Container loaded from
googletagmanager.com — GoogleMeasurement sent to
google-analytics.com — GoogleConsent
no consent gate responded on this page, so there was nothing to hold measurement back (banners are often shown only to visitors in certain regions, and this was not a European visit). Google recorded
gcs=G100 (all denied).Third parties contacted
6 hosts — cms-images.mmst.eu, static.cloudflareinsights.com, cdn.speedcurve.com, www.googletagmanager.com, assets.mmsrg.com, www.google-analytics.com
Where the data goes
Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on mediamarkt.com.tr More info »
Findings
Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.
reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.
WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.
CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.
Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured
Third parties it can reach
Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »
What the custom templates can do
Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.
__cvt_63000372_318 private injects code from connect.facebook.net · runs page-level globals__cvt_63000372_72 private injects code from dynamic.criteo.com__cvt_63000372_83 private runs page-level globalsDetected on
Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.
What this audit describes
Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.
| Container | GTM-NBFDXR9 |
|---|---|
| Published version | 89 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes. |
| Read at | 2026-08-22 10:10:46 UTC (a month ago) |
| Source | https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-NBFDXR9 |
| Body checksum | faba707c4bb77d850162a4d54976499b3e7fd7d591128cafd974d2189f4e8e41Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead. |
Re-audit
This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.
Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »