tagora
container audit

GTM-MZRN9WVN

11 tags, 1 custom scripts, 2 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags11
Custom scripts1
Third parties2
Delivered450 KB
Versions7

What we observed

A real browser loaded progenda.be 2 months ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent a consent banner was present and we accepted it. Nothing measured until it was granted — no analytics or advertising hit left the page beforehand, and 0 fired afterwards. That is the outcome consent is meant to produce. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 23 hosts — static.cdn-website.com, irp.cdn-website.com, cdn.cookie-script.com, dd-cdn.multiscreensite.com, www.googletagmanager.com, js.hs-scripts.com, d32hwlnfiv2gyn.cloudfront.net, rtc.multiscreensite.com, and 15 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, dPageView, gtm.dom, gtm.load, CookieScriptGoogleConsentUpdated, CookieScriptConsentUpdated[strict,performance,targeting,functionality,unclassified], CookieScriptCategory-strict, CookieScriptCategory-performance, CookieScriptCategory-targeting, CookieScriptCategory-functionality, CookieScriptCategory-unclassified

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on progenda.be More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.google-analytics.com ×3www.googleadservices.com ×3

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_PLWDP gallery injects code from x.cookie-script.com · runs page-level globals
__cvt_5RM3Q gallery injects code from connect.facebook.net, capi-automation.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

progenda.be

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-MZRN9WVN
Published version7 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 17:50:34 UTC (2 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MZRN9WVN
Body checksum4f18e5c2bcc101c0a41884eb1cb77644357500950aabcc6079c855dfd0adb11b
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 2 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-MZRN9WVN

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »