tagora
container audit

GTM-MV8XGRZ

179 tags, 4 custom scripts, 3 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags179
Custom scripts4
Third parties3
Delivered527 KB
Versions109

What we observed

A real browser loaded lloydspharmacy.com 2 months ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent a consent platform is present, but our browser could not complete the accept step — so the before-and-after comparison did not run here. 3 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, cdn.shopify.com, static.legitscript.com, otlp-http-production.shopifysvc.com, www.googletagmanager.com, shopify-gtm-suite.getelevar.com, cdn.jsdelivr.net, shop.app, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen productImpression, gtm.js, gtm.dom, dl_user_data, cookiehub_ready, cookiehub_necessary, cookiehub_consent_update, cookiehub_dialog, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on lloydspharmacy.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewSame Google Ads conversion defined more than once (1)
1 conversion action is defined by more than one tag.

WhyA conversion ID plus label identifies one action. Two tags carrying the same pair can report the same conversion twice, inflating conversion counts and the ROAS that bidding runs on.

CheckCheck whether both tags can fire on the same page. If they can, your Ads reporting is overstating this action and automated bidding is optimising against it.

Seenseen in 3.8% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (1)
1 piece of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.googleadservices.com ×4pixelg.adswizz.com ×1tracking.audio.thisisdax.com ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_M6BJS gallery injects code from cdn.cookiehub.eu, dash.cookiehub.com

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

lloydspharmacy.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-MV8XGRZ
Published version109 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 17:49:37 UTC (2 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MV8XGRZ
Body checksume2f77296643519f076671625c4cf4c2f00d35a15852501a1035da8d0e858cb16
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 2 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-MV8XGRZ

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »