tagora
container audit

GTM-MLM8BKD9

27 tags, 1 custom scripts, 1 third-party host — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags27
Custom scripts1
Third parties1
Delivered479 KB
Versions45

What we observed

A real browser loaded qopla.com 2 months ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to sst.qopla.se — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×4 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent Cookiebot answered its own API. 4 measurement hits left the page before it was granted, carrying a client id (whether that is permitted depends on jurisdiction, and this was not a European visit). no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. Google recorded gcs=G100 (all denied). 4 advertising hosts were contacted before anything was granted.
Third parties contacted 23 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, o242436.ingest.sentry.io, www.googletagmanager.com, www.google-analytics.com, qopla.se, image.mux.com, cdn.sanity.io, www.google.com, and 15 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load, cookie_consent_preferences, cookie_consent_statistics, cookie_consent_marketing

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to sst.qopla.se, not to Google. observed on qopla.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (1)
1 piece of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

player.vimeo.com ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_57SF4 gallery injects code from x.cookiebot.com, x.cookiebot.eu
__cvt_186338009_4 private injects code from connect.facebook.net · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

qopla.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-MLM8BKD9
Published version45 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-23 17:47:12 UTC (2 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-MLM8BKD9
Body checksumaee41ed558db0adbf419cb616bfb1b091f97d9e13db45d5470f64cf90defe079
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 2 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-MLM8BKD9

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »