tagora
container audit

GTM-KW2LJ82G

This container can hand execution to 17 third parties — more than 96% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. Each serves code it controls, which can change at any time.

Tags63
Custom scripts33
Third parties17
Delivered472 KB
Versions51

What we observed

A real browser loaded eonet.jp a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent 10 hosts appeared only after consent was granted. Google recorded gcs=G111 (all granted).
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — fonts.googleapis.com, assets.adobedtm.com, service3.eonet.ne.jp, www.googletagmanager.com, cdn-edge.karte.io, adobedc.demdex.net, s.yimg.jp, static.ads-twitter.com, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on eonet.jp More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewHardcoded http:// URL (1)
1 piece of custom code reference a plain http:// address.

WhyOn an https:// page the browser blocks or upgrades these. Blocked means the tag quietly stops working; upgraded only works if that host also serves https.

CheckCheck whether the hosts below still respond over https, and update the URLs.

Seenseen in 12.8% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (6)
6 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoVendor IDs written into custom code (3)
3 vendor IDs are pasted directly into custom HTML rather than held in a variable or template.

WhyChanging a property, pixel or account then means editing every tag that mentions it, and any one that gets missed keeps sending to the old destination indefinitely.

CheckFine if the ID never changes. If you have ever migrated a property, check that none of these still point at the old one.

Seenseen in 31.4% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

connect.facebook.net ×8www.facebook.com ×8s.yimg.jp ×7www.googleadservices.com ×6googleads.g.doubleclick.net ×5analytics.tiktok.com ×1bzrcdn.openai.com ×1cdn.smartnews-ads.com ×1d.line-cdn.net ×1d.line-scdn.net ×1i.smartnews-ads.com ×1insight.adsrvr.org ×1js.adsrvr.org ×1js.ptengine.jp ×1modules.promolayer.io ×1tags.creativecdn.com ×1tr.line.me ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_168038675_18 private injects code from static.ads-twitter.com · runs page-level globals
__cvt_168038675_200 private injects code from dynamic.criteo.com
__cvt_168038675_91 private injects code from static.ads-twitter.com · runs page-level globals
__cvt_5DFVR gallery injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_PBK7R gallery injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_TBNCF gallery injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals
__cvt_WBTFX gallery injects code from s.yimg.jp · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

eonet.jp

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-KW2LJ82G
Published version51 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-22 10:00:54 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KW2LJ82G
Body checksum305b99f276bed9011ec827e23040a0aaac53539f77c503732289eed0a3b3d6f4
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-KW2LJ82G

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »