tagora
container audit

GTM-KD3FNFD

21 tags, 3 custom scripts, 1 third-party host — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags21
Custom scripts3
Third parties1
Delivered503 KB
Versions99

What we observed

A real browser loaded fredonia.edu a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from sst.fredonia.edu — the site's own host, and googletagmanager.com
Measurement sent to sst.fredonia.edu — not Google

Measurement runs through the site's own infrastructure. Part of the tag library still comes from Google, which is normal — the two are loaded separately.

Forwarded to GA4 ×7 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent a consent banner was present and we accepted it. 6 measurement hits left the page before it was granted, carrying a client id (whether that is permitted depends on jurisdiction, and this was not a European visit). no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. 4 advertising hosts were contacted before anything was granted.
Third parties contacted 19 hosts — cdn.jsdelivr.net, use.typekit.net, www.googletagmanager.com, cse.google.com, www.google.com, analytics.google.com, stats.g.doubleclick.net, www.google.co.il, and 11 more
dataLayer events seen gtm.js, gtm.dom, udm_id, gtm.load, gtm.scrollDepth

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to sst.fredonia.edu, not to Google. observed on fredonia.edu More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites innerHTML (1)
1 piece of custom code assign to innerHTML.

WhyAssigning innerHTML parses the string as HTML. If any of it comes from the URL, the page or a cookie, that is a script-injection route into your own site.

CheckCheck whether the assigned value is a fixed template or built from something a visitor can influence.

Seenseen in 5.7% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

edge.gorillacdn.com ×2

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_11382980_274 private injects code from connect.facebook.net · runs page-level globals
__cvt_11382980_328 private injects code from opencdn.fpjs.sh · runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

fredonia.edu

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-KD3FNFD
Published version99 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-13 09:21:02 UTC (2 months ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-KD3FNFD
Body checksum3e7157bcd1a00b64b82d7c40133a75350b36e74a3320549d816fc230190cc223
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from 2 months ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-KD3FNFD

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »