tagora
container audit

GTM-K342LPW

235 tags, 676 KB delivered to every visitor — more than 90% of the 46,522 containers we have measured. Size is a description here, not a fault.

Tags235
Custom scripts8
Third parties4
Delivered676 KB
Versions270

Where the data goes

Likely — the container names , a tagging-style host on its own domain. No page load of ours has confirmed it. More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewdocument.write (1)
1 piece of custom code call document.write.

Whydocument.write blocks the HTML parser while it runs, and browsers ignore it entirely once the page has finished parsing — so an async-loaded tag using it can silently do nothing.

CheckIf these tags fire on page load they are costing render time; if they fire later they may not be working at all. Worth confirming the tag still does what it was added to do.

Seenseen in 18.4% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewWrites cookies directly (1)
1 piece of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (1)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

cas.zma.gs ×2www.cafeappliances.com ×2www.geappliances.com ×2cdn.cookielaw.org ×1

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_13327986_970 private injects code from unpkg.com

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

geappliances.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-K342LPW
Published version270 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-11 20:54:37 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-K342LPW
Body checksum8d75f05c8dc24a86ff0e41c77287aee115ee47817ce862847a380fb3612f53e2
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-K342LPW

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »