tagora
container audit

GTM-5MMXJPX

110 tags, 14 custom scripts, 5 third-party hosts — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags110
Custom scripts14
Third parties5
Delivered534 KB
Versions189

Where the data goes

Not checked — this audit ran against a container ID, so no page was read. More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewdocument.write (7)
7 pieces of custom code call document.write.

Whydocument.write blocks the HTML parser while it runs, and browsers ignore it entirely once the page has finished parsing — so an async-loaded tag using it can silently do nothing.

CheckIf these tags fire on page load they are costing render time; if they fire later they may not be working at all. Worth confirming the tag still does what it was added to do.

Seenseen in 18.4% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewSame GA4 property configured more than once (1)
G-9T188S6C63 is configured by 2 separate tags.

WhyEach config tag initialises the property independently, so a single page view can be counted once per tag. Sessions, users and conversion rates all inherit the error.

CheckIf more than one of these fires on the same page you are double-counting. Compare against a known-good day, or check for a step change in traffic when the second tag was added.

Seenseen in 4.8% of 46,522 containers measured

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoOne variable that a great deal depends on (71)
"gtm.elementUrl" is read by 71 tags and triggers — more than anything else in this container.

WhyGTM shows you where a variable is defined, never how much depends on it. Editing this one touches a large share of the container at once, and whatever breaks will surface somewhere that looks unrelated to the change.

CheckBefore changing it, check what reads it. If it feeds both measurement and consent or routing logic, split those uses apart first.

Seenseen in 10.1% of 46,522 containers measured

infoLoads JavaScript from another host (4)
4 pieces of custom code fetch and run JavaScript from another host.

WhyWhatever that host serves executes with full access to the page — it can read the DOM, cookies and form fields. The code is not in this container, so it can change at any time without any change here.

CheckConfirm you recognise every host below and that someone owns the relationship. A host you cannot name is the one to chase.

Seenseen in 54.4% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.google-analytics.com ×61www.googleadservices.com ×4cd.ladsp.com ×2cdn. ×1s.yimg.jp ×1

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

ykkap.co.jp

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-5MMXJPX
Published version189 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-13 08:16:10 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-5MMXJPX
Body checksuma97ccc5626e91355d3e082285c0980afe9e57de9542cedcf1c2b4bfa270a5cf8
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-5MMXJPX

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »