tagora
container audit

GTM-53VFLLN

53 tags, 9 custom scripts, 1 third-party host — an ordinary container, near the middle of what we measure (median: 39 tags, 4 custom scripts).

Tags53
Custom scripts9
Third parties1
Delivered509 KB
Versions810

What we observed

A real browser loaded uptodate.com a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to google-analytics.com — Google
Consent OneTrust answered its own API. no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision.
Third parties contacted 6 hosts — www.google.com, www.gstatic.com, cdn.cookielaw.org, cdn.wolterskluwer.io, www.googletagmanager.com, privacyportal-de.onetrust.com
dataLayer events seen OneTrustLoaded, OptanonLoaded, gtm.js, gtm.dom, gtm.load, gtm.triggerGroup, gtm.scrollDepth

Where the data goes

Not observed — on the page we loaded, measurement went to Google and nowhere else. observed on uptodate.com More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewWrites cookies directly (1)
1 piece of custom code set cookies in code.

WhyCookies set this way bypass GTM's consent settings, because the consent checks live in the tag templates rather than in raw JavaScript.

CheckIf any of these cookies are used for analytics or advertising, confirm they are still gated on a consent decision.

Seenseen in 21.2% of 46,522 containers measured

infoConsent configuration detected (2)
The container declares one or more consent signals.

WhyConsent handling is present in the container. This describes what the artifact declares; what actually happened on the page is measured separately, above.

CheckConfirm these settings match the consent policy you intend to enforce, and compare them with the before-and-after observation.

Seenseen in 44.6% of 46,522 containers measured

infoUses browser storage (1)
1 piece of custom code read or write localStorage or sessionStorage.

WhyBrowser storage persists across visits and is not covered by cookie consent tooling, so it is easy to overlook when auditing what you keep on a visitor's device.

CheckConfirm nothing personal is being kept there, and that it is covered by your privacy notice.

Seenseen in 23.3% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

www.wolterskluwer.com ×2

What the custom templates can do

Custom templates are third-party code shipped inside the container. Injecting scripts and running page globals is ordinary for them — most tag templates need it to work — so this is an inventory, not a warning. It lists the capability each template declares so you can match it against templates you meant to install.

__cvt_11822407_790 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_11822407_1123 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_11822407_1187 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_11822407_1190 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_11822407_1196 private runs page-level globals
__cvt_11822407_797 private runs page-level globals

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

uptodate.com

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-53VFLLN
Published version810 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-22 09:46:47 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-53VFLLN
Body checksumd746532816e19d45958fa2114dcaf07ff801403f11cbe0d186e3a8f4a15d159f
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-53VFLLN

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »