tagora
container audit

GTM-4XSC

7 tags, no hand-written scripts, 0 third-party hosts — smaller than 80% of the 46,522 containers we have measured, and carrying none of the hand-written JavaScript most of them do.

Tags7
Custom scripts0
Third parties0
Delivered335 KB
Versions829

What we observed

A real browser loaded golfdigest.co.jp a month ago and recorded every request it made. This is what happened, as distinct from what the container is configured to do. It is one page load — anything that fires only deeper in the site did not fire here.

Container loaded from googletagmanager.com — Google
Measurement sent to sgtm.golfdigest.co.jp — not Google

Measurement is first-party; the container still loads from Google. These are separate decisions, and this is the more common of the two.

Forwarded to GA4 ×4 — read from the measurement id, not the hostname
Consent Quantcast answered its own API. 4 measurement hits left the page before it was granted, carrying a client id (whether that is permitted depends on jurisdiction, and this was not a European visit). no new hosts appeared after granting — either the tags are ungated, or they fire regardless and record the decision. Google recorded gcs=G1 (no consent signal). 7 advertising hosts were contacted before anything was granted.
Third parties contacted 25 hosts — i.gimg.jp, cdnjs.cloudflare.com, securepubads.g.doubleclick.net, www.googletagmanager.com, fundingchoicesmessages.google.com, cdn-edge.karte.io, www.clarity.ms, cdn.hera.d2c.ne.jp, and 17 more
dataLayer events seen spideraf.pv.score.block, gtm.dom, gtm.load

Where the data goes

Confirmed — a browser watched this site send measurement data to sgtm.golfdigest.co.jp, not to Google. observed on golfdigest.co.jp More info »

Findings

Ordered by consequence. review has a concrete cost when it bites; info is real but depends on your setup. Seen is how common it is across the containers we have measured — reported separately on purpose, because common and harmless are different claims.

reviewNo consent signal in the container (1)
Nothing in this container sets, reads, or gates on a consent state.

WhyThe container itself neither sets a Consent Mode default, holds any tag back for consent, nor references a known consent platform. Either enforcement lives entirely outside GTM — where it cannot be audited from here — or tags fire regardless of what a visitor chose.

CheckIf a consent platform blocks scripts before GTM loads, this is fine — confirm that is actually the case. If not, tags are firing on a choice nobody recorded.

Seenseen in 52.1% of 46,522 containers measured

Third parties it can reach

Each host is a party that can execute code or receive data in a visitor's browser. Follow one to see who else loads it. More info »

No third-party hosts were found in this container's tags.

Detected on

Sites observed loading this container. A container used across many hosts is a shared template; one on a single host is a bespoke build. Follow a site to see every container it loads.

golfdigest.co.jp

What this audit describes

Containers change. These findings describe one specific artifact, and you can re-fetch it to check this reading.

ContainerGTM-4XSC
Published version829 — the identity of this configuration. It changes only when someone publishes.
Read at2026-08-12 22:15:39 UTC (a month ago)
Sourcehttps://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-4XSC
Body checksum698f4c85a33167553212e2ae2b5b69b9c22567f425d064d3a5fe4c891e3b4912
Evidence of the exact bytes we read, not an identity: Google varies the response per request, so re-fetching an unchanged container yields a different checksum. Compare the published version instead.

Re-audit

This reading is from a month ago. A container can be republished at any time, and nothing here updates on its own — a fresh read is the only way to know whether it still says this. Running it again replaces this page in place, so the link keeps working.

Re-audit GTM-4XSC

Check another container

Put this container under version control. Tagora exports it to a repository you own, so every change arrives as a pull request. How it works »